Dork Awards After-Party: Those We Excluded, and Why

Last week, we wrapped up our countdown of the Best Funnybooks of 2013, and I felt like there were some rather glaring omissions. Popular, critically-acclaimed books that I just didn’t include. And, even with our standard One Dork’s Opinion disclaimer… I thought I should maybe give that opinion on some of those books, too. Just ’cause, you know?

So let’s get to it, then. First, with the popular five-hundred-pound gorilla in the room…

The Walking Dead, by Robert Kirkman and Charlie Adlard

When I called Rachel Rising the best horror comic on the market, I immediately thought of this book. It often gets that same label, but what can I say? Walking Dead‘s just not my cup of tea. I’ve never been real big on post-apocalypse fiction in general, and the zombie apocalypse in particular. I’m more interested in societies and how they function than I am in mere anarchy being unleashed upon the world. That’s really only going to go one way, and we’ve seen it in real life over and over again, all across the globe. And (though they’re really just set dressing in Walking Dead), zombies bore me. I mean, sure. Disease-ridden corpses that want to eat you are scary and gross. But I’m more entertained by the weird and unexplainable, so zombies seem a bit bland.

I also think that Walking Dead is only pretty good. It’s not bad, by any stretch. Robert Kirkman is great at testing his characters’ loyalty and resolve in the face of a lawless world, and Charlie Adlard is a reliable draftsman. The art never really sings, though…

(this striking cover image notwithstanding)

(this striking cover image notwithstanding)

…and while the writing is certainly competent, it’s never truly inspired. I can deal with uninspired execution if the subject matter interests me enough, but that’s not the case here. Regardless, I kind of needed both inspiration and interest for a book to make it into my Best of the Year, and Walking Dead gave me neither.

For a book that gave me one but not the other, we must look to the critically-acclaimed five-hundred-pound gorilla…

Love and Rockets, by Los Bros Hernandez

Nothing surprised me more than the fact that I forgot to put this book into my initial list of 25. I laughed when I remembered it, because duh! Of COURSE Love and Rockets needed to be on the list! I tacked it on, figuring I’d bump something else when it came time to write stuff up. But when that time came… I couldn’t remember what happened in this year’s issue. And when I went to look at it to refresh my memory… I couldn’t find it. After tearing the funnybook library apart looking for it, I came to the slow realization that I just hadn’t picked it up. I made a note to do so ASAP, then it hit me: if I’d missed Love and Rockets, and hadn’t even realized it… Did it really belong on my list?

I still bought it and read it, of course, and it’s as insanely well-done as you’d expect. But while I found myself appreciating how good the book was, I also wasn’t really enjoying the reading that much. I think that’s because Killer and Tonta (Gilbert and Jaime’s respective new leads) just haven’t grabbed me.

Though I thought this scene with Tonta was pretty funny.

Though I thought this scene with Tonta was pretty funny.

It was only a couple of years ago that I was thinking that Jaime might need to move on from his Locas characters and explore other avenues. But now that he has, well… Let’s just say that I appreciate the irony.

At any rate. Between not realizing I’d missed this year’s issue and not enjoying it as much as usual when I did get it, I was convinced. Good as it is, Love and Rockets didn’t belong on this year’s Best Funnybook list. One Dork’s Opinion, and all that.

And then, of course, there’s the third five-hundred-pound gorilla, which had my interest but was lacking elsewhere…

Saga, by Brian K Vaughn and Fiona Staples

I keep wanting to like Saga, but I just don’t. Why? Well, in spite of some great weird characters, the execution of this book annoys the piss out of me. I don’t like the plot mechanics much, but the most annoying thing on the surface, I think, is the language. Though Saga is the story of two warring space empires, a far-flung fantasy future complete with magic and lasers, everyone speaks in the idiom of present-day America. Or, to be more precise, in the idiom of present-day educated middle-class America. Or, to be specific, in the idiom of present-day educated middle-class Americans who are trying to be clever all the damn time.

It’s the sort of thing that Pixar and its imitators have been doing for going on 20 years. And it works for them because they’re doing light comedy for children. But Vaughn’s trying to apply that approach to a story for adults that’s often not comedic at all, and it doesn’t work for me. I’m not saying that I want the book to use the high language of traditional fantasy and space opera. You can have more relaxed dialogue in this sort of thing. But you also have to strike a balance. If the language sounds too on-the-nose modern, it destroys the verisimilitude of the setting. Though I can’t believe I’m citing Star Wars in a discussion of good dialogue, I do think Lucas hit the proper tone with that film. The language is relaxed enough to sound familiar without being so familiar that it’s like a bunch of contemporary movie characters were transported to a galaxy far, far away. Saga does have that feel, and it takes me out of the story.

But I mentioned plot mechanics earlier, and that’s also a problem for me. Not the specific details of the story itself; the series’ “lovers from warring factions” set-up is classic, and I really do love the extreme weirdness of the thing. No, what I’m talking about here is more the nuts and bolts of plot movement, the specific way scenes play out. It’s difficult to explain, especially since I don’t have the comics at hand to pick out examples. But there’s something of a “Screenwriting 101” feel to the book, making even the more outre and unexpected moments seem like something I’ve seen before.

Fiona Staples’ staging of things is also partially to blame for this, I think. She draws well, and can design the shit out of some aliens…

Staples Saga

…but she’s not always the most dynamic or innovative storyteller in the world. She’s not bad, but her layout and camera placement are just sort of… what you’d expect. She seldom surprises and never really sings. But Vaughn’s scripts might actually need someone whose storytelling goes beyond the everyday, and she doesn’t often deliver that.

Whatever the root cause of it is, I’m bored by things that I shouldn’t be bored by, and that bugs me. Which is, I guess, what I’m saying about Saga overall: it’s too safe in its execution, and that bothers me. It’s an un-Hollywood sort of story being told in a very Hollywood sort of way. It doesn’t demand my attention, and so doesn’t belong among my best of the year.

So let’s see… What else? What else? I’m sure there are other glaring omissions. I can’t remember if Chris Ware or Dan Clowes put books out this year, but I’ve discussed before how I admire their talent but don’t enjoy their work. And I do have a sudden sinking feeling that I forgot about a new Optic Nerve comic from Adrian Tomine that I did enjoy. But if it slipped my mind that easily, maybe that’s okay. So to close things out, I’m going to talk about a book that very nearly made the list, but got bumped at the last minute…

Afterlife With Archie, by Roberto Aguirre Sacasa and Francesco Franavilla

The real appeal here is in the premise: the zombie apocalypse comes to Riverdale. Now, as I said at the outset, I’m not a big zombie fan. Neither am I a big Archie fan. But the juxtaposition of the two is an inherently funny idea, and the comic itself is bloodily charming. It’s written in the style of a nighttime teen drama, and is a reminder of why the Archie characters have such enduring appeal: they’re high school archetypes with equally archetypcal relationships. Add in the zombies, and you’ve got a small-town horror show with a cast of characters you already know and care about. Kind of genius, really.

Of course, even that sure-fire of an idea wouldn’t work if the execution was poor. But Aguirre Sacasa’s scripts offer up a slightly more mature take on the Archie gang that still feels true to their established personalities. And the art. Well. Francesco Francavilla is maybe the most popular of a growing group of comics artists who are bringing classic cartooning chops back into mainstream funnybooks. Francavilla’s both fast and good (a rare combination of talents), and landing him for this project is probably the best move Archie Comics has made with it. He’s what got me to pick it up, anyway, and I haven’t been disappointed.

Francavilla Afterlife With Archie

He’s not a Frank Quitely, whose every panel is a dynamic work of art unto itself. But he is a guy who delivers nothing less than rock-solid work, punctuated by more dynamic moments that sell the book as a whole, and maybe have more immediate impact because they come less frequently. In the long run, the Quitely approach is richer, and rewards re-reading on books that will stand up to multiple readings. But for throw-away pop comics like this one? Francavilla is ideal.

Why didn’t Afterlife With Archie make the list, then? Ultimately, because it is throw-away pop comics. I like it just fine, but I’ll never re-read it, and will probably switch to digital on it pretty soon just to keep the things from cluttering up my house. But also? Well… I only wanted one Honorable Mention. It was between this book and Jason Aaron & Esad Ribic’s Thor, and I had an axe to grind with that book on the subject of creative vision vs corporate marketing. So Archie got the bump. But I’ve talked about it now anyway, so I suppose it’s all good.

And that, finally, wraps up our look at the best funnybooks of 2013. I have no idea what I’ll be writing about next week, but I’m sure it’ll be… something. Or maybe just a couple of pretty pictures. Whatever happens, I hope to see you then.

4 comments on “Dork Awards After-Party: Those We Excluded, and Why

  1. sj says:

    I can understand that you don’t like Saga (even though it makes me sad), but what about Sheltered and Revival? I read both of those this year and loooooooooved them.

  2. John Bullard says:

    Too funny. My top two favorites for 2013: Batman Incorporated and Saga. Great writing Mark. A lot here I’ll be checking out. Been wanting to read Rachel Rising and you’ve convinced me to give it a try.

    • Mark Brett says:

      Hey, at least we agree on one of those two! And I’m glad I convinced at least one person to try Rachel Rising. It’s a favorite, and I’ve heard recently that sales aren’t rosy.

      Thanks for the compliment, and the comment. Both are much appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s